International Modeling Foundation — Agency
Version 1.1 | Effective: June 28, 2026
This agreement forms part of your agency's certification contract with the International Modeling Foundation (“IMF”, “we”, “us”). By completing certification, your agency understands and agrees to the following regarding its public certification status and related matters.
Your certification status is publicly verifiable through the Model ID verification tool at model-id.com/verify. This allows brands, models, and other industry participants to confirm your certification is valid.
Your certification status may change during or after your certification period.
| Status | Meaning | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Certification valid and in good standing | Until expiry/renewal |
| Suspended | Temporarily paused | 30, 60, or 90 days |
| Revoked | Permanently removed | Permanent |
| Expired | Period ended without renewal | Until renewed |
| Withdrawn | Voluntarily ended in good standing | Final |
Warning points. Verified reports may result in warnings issued across three tiers — administrative, professional, and safety — with weighted points. Accumulating 7 or more active warning points triggers a mandatory review of your certification, which may result in suspension.
Points from issues that are resolved are withdrawn and no longer count toward this total — resolution actively clears the path.
Severe matters — a fourth tier covering sexual harassment or assault, serious harm, criminal activity, and AI deepfakes — bypass the warning system entirely. IMF may suspend or revoke certification immediately for severe matters, without accumulation of points and without prior warning. This direct-action path is reserved for matters where the nature of the conduct makes graduated warning inappropriate.
Suspension duration:
After suspension ends:
Revocation is permanent removal of your certification. This may occur due to:
Revocation cannot be reversed, but you may appeal the decision within 14 days.
You may request deletion of your Model ID account at any time. However, certain records are maintained as described below.
Where this section provides for retention of certification records after deletion, IMF processes that data under Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR — legitimate interests — and, where the underlying conduct concerns special-category data, Article 9(2)(g) (substantial public interest under Union or Member State law on the basis of professional integrity and consumer protection).
The legitimate interests pursued are: (a) preventing certificate fraud (an agency obtaining certification, using it commercially, then deleting evidence); (b) protecting brands, models, and other industry participants from misidentification, repeat conduct, or recidivism; and (c) maintaining the integrity of the certification register as a public-trust mechanism. IMF balances these interests against your fundamental rights, retaining only the minimum data needed for each category and tier (see §5.4) and removing names from public records where the safety/severe threshold is not met.
You may object to processing under Article 21. IMF reviews objections case by case and will weigh your interest in erasure against the public interest in maintaining the record. Severe-tier records (sexual assault, serious harm, criminal activity, AI deepfakes — see §4.2) are retained on the basis that the public interest substantially outweighs the data subject's interest in erasure, by analogy with public licensing-board records.
(Never suspended, never revoked, no unresolved reports)
| Timeframe | What happens |
|---|---|
| Immediately | Profile, documents, agency details deleted |
| Immediately | Status changes to “Withdrawn” |
| Until original expiry date | Verification shows: Agency name, certificate number, “Withdrawn”, validity dates |
| After original expiry | Certificate number only retained (no name), showing “No longer valid” |
This prevents an agency from obtaining certification, using it to win work, then deleting evidence of its certification. It also prevents certificate fraud.
Same as 5.1 — past suspensions do not affect your deletion rights if you're currently in good standing.
Your revocation record is maintained based on the category:
| Category | Examples | Visibility | Then |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative | Payment issues, documentation problems | 3 years | Certificate number only, no name |
| Professional | Ethics violations, contract breaches | 5 years | Certificate number only, no name |
| Safety | Harassment, exploitation, coercion | Permanent | Name and status remain visible |
| Severe | Sexual assault, serious criminal conduct | Permanent | Name and status remain visible |
Model ID operates a reporting system to maintain industry safety and certification integrity.
Named Reports:
Anonymous Reports:
Verified reports may result in warnings (administrative, professional, or safety tier) with weighted points. Reaching 7 active points triggers mandatory review and possible suspension; resolved issues are withdrawn and do not count. Severe matters bypass the warning system and may result in immediate suspension or revocation.
| Tier | Retention |
|---|---|
| Administrative | 1 year from resolution |
| Professional | 2 years from resolution |
| Safety | 3 years from resolution |
| Severe | Permanent |
| Unresolved | Retained until resolved |
Reports themselves are never publicly visible. Only outcomes (suspension or revocation) may become visible if enforcement thresholds are reached.
If a reported issue is resolved, the report is marked Withdrawn, any associated warning points are removed from your active total, and the matter is not publicly visible. Resolved issues do not count toward suspension thresholds.
Model ID exists to protect the modeling industry from exploitation, fraud, and safety risks. Maintaining accurate, public certification records:
This is consistent with how professional licensing boards worldwide maintain public records of certification status and disciplinary actions.
Retention of these records is grounded in Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interests) and, where relevant, Article 9(2)(g) (substantial public interest). See §5.0 for detail.
13.1 Nature of Certification. IMF certification reflects information disclosed by the agency in its certification application at the time of submission, and IMF's review of that information against published certification criteria. Certification is not an audit or warranty of the agency's ongoing operations, conduct, or compliance with any law.
13.2 No Endorsement. IMF does not endorse, sponsor, or vouch for the commercial practices, contractual arrangements, employment practices, or business conduct of certified agencies. Certification confirms the agency met the criteria at the point of review; it does not certify the agency's continuing conduct.
13.3 No Liability for Agency Acts. IMF assumes no liability for any acts, omissions, contractual or non-contractual conduct, or any harm or loss caused by a certified agency, its principals, employees, or contractors. The agency remains solely responsible for its own actions and any related liability.
13.4 Reliance. Third parties relying on IMF certification do so on the understanding that certification is a point-in-time review of the agency's self-disclosed information and not a continuing guarantee. Use of the IMF certification mark by third parties to identify a certified agency does not transfer any liability from the agency to IMF.
13.5 Misrepresentation. Where certification was obtained on the basis of misrepresentation or material omission, IMF may revoke certification retroactively and bears no liability for any reliance placed on the certification during that period.
13.6 Information surfaced post-certification. Certification reflects information available to IMF at the time of approval. As reports, investigations, or new community input bring new information to light, IMF may revise certification status accordingly. This includes cases where no misrepresentation occurred — IMF's review is a point-in-time judgment and may be updated as the evidence base changes.
Most decisions affecting your certification — including approvals, warnings, suspensions, revocations, and appeals — are made by IMF. The following escalation framework supplements that decision-making.
IMF may, at its discretion, escalate the following types of decisions to an independent Advisory Council for advisory review:
Parties to a matter (the certified entity, reporters, or other affected persons) cannot request escalation. Escalation is solely at IMF's initiative, to protect the integrity of the Council from external influence.
Information presented to the Advisory Council is anonymised before review. Names of reporters, accused persons, witnesses, and where practicable the certified entity itself are redacted. Where the prior conduct of a party is materially relevant, IMF provides that context without disclosing identity (e.g., “this party has had prior enforcement actions”).
The Advisory Council provides a recommendation by majority vote, with panels convened in odd numbers where practicable. The final decision rests with IMF's board, typically exercised by a designated board member with legal expertise. The board may decline to follow a Council recommendation where it has good-faith reasons to do so, including matters of particular sensitivity, conflicts of interest, urgency, or other circumstances making Council guidance inappropriate. Where the Council does not reach a clear recommendation, the board decides based on the matter as presented.
IMF's Advisory Council is in formation. Until fully constituted, IMF makes all decisions internally.
15.1 Bilateral nature of IMF certification. IMF certification is a bilateral relationship between IMF and each individual agency. IMF is not a trade association, industry forum, or coordination mechanism. Certification does not create any contractual, organisational, or informational link between certified agencies.
15.2 Agency responsibility for compliance. Your agency remains solely responsible for its own compliance with all applicable competition, antitrust, and trade-practice laws. IMF certification does not provide legal advice, does not constitute a competition-law compliance review, and does not protect against, excuse, or limit your agency's exposure to investigation, enforcement, or penalty under such laws.
15.3 What certification does NOT authorise. Without limiting the foregoing, IMF certification does NOT authorise or facilitate any of the following between certified agencies:
If IMF later offers any forum, communication channel, publication, or service whose function would or could include any of the foregoing, that activity is outside the scope of this certification and is governed by its own terms.
15.4 Your acknowledgement. By accepting certification, your agency acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to obtain its own legal advice on competition-law matters and accepts sole responsibility for its conduct in this area.
For questions about this agreement or your certification records:
International Modeling Foundation, Netherlands
This agreement is a binding part of the IMF Certification Contract. By completing certification, you confirm that you have read, understood, and agreed to all provisions above.
© 2026 International Modeling Foundation. All rights reserved.